|
|
There is no one type of pallet rack which best suits all applications. Cost plays a major role in deciding what rack to use. This computer racking cost comparison model was developed to quantify the total cost differences between racking types. The model calculates the theoretical expected annual storage and handling cost per unit for different storage options. It takes the capital and running cost of the building, material handling equipment, retrieval and storage actions and racking into account. The different options which are currently compared are: block stacking, drive-in racking, standard racking, narrow aisle racking, push back racking and mobile racking. The model can however be easily extended to incorporate other racking types. The idea behind the model is to give the user the opportunity to "play" with different storage heights, bay lengths and aisle widths and to compare the cost and space results between the options. The model also gives the user the opportunity to see the effect that degree of accessibility to pallets has on cost. The cost inputs do not necessarily have to be extremely accurate. One tests the cost sensitivity by for instance looking at what effect it would have if a cost item were to increase by say 10%. The strength of a model such as this lies in the speed at which one can look at the cost effect of various options. HOW DOES THE MODEL WORK? |
![]() |
|
In the second section the different variables used for the cost calculations are set. These are variables regarding the capital costs, the material handling equipment and running costs.
In this section the user is also required to give information regarding utilisation. Note that the default values are used if information is not given in blue
|
![]() |
|
The third section is where the different racking and stacking options (eg. block stacking, drive-in racking, etc.) costs are calculated using the information from section one and two. At our recent seminar, delegates were given the opportunity to use the model. They jointly decided to compare a warehouse where: 4000 pallets needed to be stored. The result is as depicted in the following table and graphs. |
|
STORAGE COST COMPARISON MODEL : |
||||||
|
RACKING,BUILDING AND HANDLING METHODS |
||||||
|
Your choice of storage requirements was: |
||||||
|
Number of pallets to be stored |
4000 |
|||||
|
The weight of a pallet |
1.2 |
ton |
||||
|
The number of layers high |
4 |
|||||
|
Number of pallet rotations in a year |
9 |
|||||
|
Block |
Drive-in |
Standard |
Narrow-aisle |
Push-back |
Mobile |
|
|
Stacking |
Racking |
Racking |
Racking |
Racking |
Racking |
|
|
Utilisation factor |
0.6 |
0.7 |
1.00 |
1.00 |
0.8 |
1.00 |
|
Building area (m2) |
2986.2 |
3226.1 |
5385.6 |
3264.0 |
2250.0 |
2084.5 |
|
Capital cost per pallet storage position |
R 1,079 |
R 1,441 |
R 2,104 |
R 1,400 |
R 1,687 |
R 1,930 |
|
Annual storage and handling cost per pallet stored |
R 23 |
R 33 |
R 43 |
R 32 |
R 46 |
R 52 |
![]() |
|
|
|
|
|
Click to go back to the Racking Seminar Page | Click to go back to the Home Page |